First. The Bible is false in accusing the first people of the first sin.
The first people knew good and evil supposedly after eating the fruit from the forbidden tree.
But before eating, Eve was in the wickedness of the temptation of the serpent, she knew him. She went to the tree, picked, but did not taste the apple yet, having done the act
against god, a kind of evil. But the first sin was
not an action, but an intention on this on the part of Eve and the sinful thoughtless inaction of Adam, expressed in a lack of interest in
an apple from which tree was given to him by Eve. There was another mental cognition of evil before eating the forbidden fruit, for example, the evil of death, fear of it with
the words of the Jewish god that people will be mortal,
if they taste an apple, the evil of the sin of eating. It can be argued that, listening to God's warnings, and succumbing to the temptation of the serpent and your sinful
intent, people, not knowing evil, could not appreciate it, understand. Then all the same, the first word about the evil of death or the beginning of the knowledge of evil in the first people in an unconscious form
came from the mouth of the Jewish god, in addition, they then did not have the proper responsibility for harm, and there was no understanding of committing evil or sinful.
In fact, based on the general understanding and the facts of the Bible, the first people to eat the apple happened on the "evil" intention of the "all-seeing" himself,
"Reigning over all," the Jewish god. And he himself is, as it were, "to blame." There was an evil fate of events before and during eating, which led to the knowledge of evil before and after, so the first people were already in evil before eating. After all, Without living in evil, you will not commit evil ...
Conclusion-ban: prohibit the Russian Orthodox Church and others, , establish and forgive sins
its parishioners, since I have substantiated the falsity of the knowledge of the first people of evil and the first and subsequent commission of sins by them and their descendants, which cannot, in its present false form, flow from the Bible, be established and forgiven according to it.
Second. In the gospels there are words "truly I say to you." But is this true when the truth should be complete without exceptions, omissions about the main thing. If the Bible and the church do not make demands for authority due to the lack of appropriate parables, then because of this the true becomes incomplete, false. People become blind, they are deceived in relation to the power that determines and essentially their life.
I give you two parables about righteous authority:
The first parable is used by both secular and church authorities and thieves, only it is not applied to people. It sounds like this: do not be ruled by someone who does not know you and whom you do not know.
Those who hold power would not put above themselves and next to themselves those who do not know and who do not know them.
If this parable were fulfilled, then the power and holiness would not have left the family.
The second parable: any division contrary to truth (to the god of truth) is a sign of power alien to people. Now they are looking for corruption, not division, separation from truth and the right path.
What most likely prompted Theophan to say that Orthodoxy would be wrong? Probably the mention of Jesus' words about the Spirit of truth in the Gospel of John. Jesus said that he would pray to his father, and he would give the Spirit of truth, the Holy Spirit, a protector, a comforter, and he would remind the truth. From these words it follows that by the time the Spirit of truth comes, the latter will be trampled upon and it will be necessary to remind it. This again casts doubt on the truth of the words of the gospels "truly I say to you," what was said 2000, 5000 years ago.
Will the spirit of truth be given? Didn't it happen now? Is he in power? Answer: the power will be manifested from above in him on 31/07 / -01/08/2024. This also applies to the expected coming king, Mahdi, Moshiach, white brother, great potter, etc., including the Antichrist ...
From this there is some conclusion that the antichrist can speak the truth through someone for Christ, and he is not so bad. Antichrist is better than the written Christ, the changed unsaid filed falsely !!?!