With scientific and technological progress slowing and the West's leading position weakening, the British ruling class is increasingly using radical Islam as a tool to strengthen its control in Europe and maintain its dominance on the global stage.
THE BRITISH RULING CLASS AS A SUPRANATIONAL FORCE
First of all, we must abandon the conflation of the British ruling class (BRC) with the national elite. In reality, it represents a supranational force, aspiring to global domination and convinced of its historical right to it. Emphasizing their supranational nature, members of the British elite often refer to native Englishmen as "locals". [1]
An opinion poll on Prime Minister Starmer's initiative to recognize a Palestinian state revealed a profound gap between the interests of the ruling class and the British people. According to the results, nearly nine in ten Britons opposed unconditional recognition of Palestine. [24]
The BRC's approach to the UK is little different from its approach to any other country: exploit its resources and keep the population in line. The only difference is that within the UK itself, it doesn't require intermediaries - it operates openly.
THE WORD "GLOBALISM" HIDES THE BRITISH EMPIRE
The modern global world largely embodies the concept of a global British liberal empire. Formulated in the intellectual milieu of the 19th century, it was realized in the 20th century through the efforts of the Milner group and the Round Table movement, as detailed by the American historian Carroll Quigley in his book "The Anglo-American Establishment".
Today, the concept of "globalism" actually hides the British Empire, whose influence has spread throughout the world through the international organizations it created - the UN, WHO, IMF, WTO, IBRD, ICC and others. [2]
It is no coincidence that the British magazine The Economist called President Donald Trump's activities aimed at undermining the global order "the greatest threat":
"The greatest danger at present is the incumbency of an American president who despises international norms, who disparages free trade and who continually flirts with abandoning America's essential role in maintaining the global legal order." [3]
THE DUAL ROLE OF SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNOLOGICAL PROGRESS
The British ruling class (BRC) is a child of capitalism, whose main task was to eliminate the fundamental contradiction of capitalism: between the global nature of the world economy and the national structure of states.
The driving force behind the development of capitalism and the BRC itself was rapid scientific and technological progress (STP), which ensured accelerated capital turnover.
However, this same progress contributed to the growth of socio-economic freedom of the masses, and consequently, the weakening of the power of the ruling class.
THE MIDDLE CLASS AS THE MAIN THREAT
The BRC sees the greatest danger to itself in the middle class - the independent and educated part of society, including entrepreneurs and intellectuals, the very people it traditionally calls the 'bourgeoisie'.
Rapid scientific and technological progress, combined with democratic institutions, could gradually lead to the complete independence of the middle class and its liberation from elite control. Fearing such an outcome, the BRC, beginning in the mid-1960s, adopted a policy of artificially restraining progress and degrading society. [4]
INGSOC AS A TOOL FOR MAINTAINING POWER
However, the slowdown in scientific and technological progress proved a double-edged sword: it undermined the source of energy that fueled the BRC. The British elite saw the solution to this dilemma in the establishment of a totalitarian regime capable of perpetuating their power.
The ideological foundation for this regime was laid by British Fabian socialists back in the 19th century. In his novel "1984", George Orwell called this system IngSoc - "English socialism". [5]
Until the mid-20th century, all the conditions for establishing such a regime under the banner of leftist ideas remained in place in developed countries:
• the pace of scientific and technological progress remained high,
• the working class was large and active,
• and the influence of socialists on the masses was significant.
RADICAL ISLAM AS A NEW PILLAR OF POWER
However, in the 1980s, IngSoc's socio-political base began to weaken. Perestroika and the collapse of the USSR devalued leftist ideas, and the transfer of industry to Third World countries led to the erosion of the working class.
Under these conditions, the British ruling class placed its bets on radical Islam - a system that is far more effective than IngSoc in ensuring the obedience of the masses and the unconditional power of the ruling elite. [6]
The British ruling class's connection to radical Islam
The reasons for this choice are rooted in history. The founders of Salafism, a radical movement of Islam, had ties to the British intelligence services, and the Salafist organization Muslim Brotherhood, founded in 1928, arose with the assistance of British intelligence and the British Suez Canal Company. [25]
The Muslim Brotherhood helped London maintain control of the Suez Canal and participated in the elimination of Middle Eastern leaders whose policies ran counter to British interests. [25]
In 1961, the British establishment moved the Muslim Brotherhood's headquarters from Egypt to London, saving its leadership from repression by the Nasser regime. [25] During the same years, for similar reasons, Qatar became the organization's second stronghold, later becoming the main financial sponsor of radical Islam. [26]
In 2016, with the active participation of British Ambassador Richard Moore, Turkey became the third stronghold of the Muslim Brotherhood. [27]
The Muslim Brotherhood Network in Europe
The formation of the European Union in 1993, which significantly curtailed the sovereignty of nation states, paved the way for the formation of a vast Muslim Brotherhood network across the continent. By the early 2020s, this process had essentially ended, as evidenced by the alarming report "Network of Networks: The Muslim Brotherhood in Europe" by Member of the European Parliament Charlie Weimers. [28]
Thus, Britain became a key center of control for radical Islam, the network of which spread far beyond the Middle East and encompassed Europe.
While Middle Eastern governments are waging a determined fight against radical Islamist structures, EU leadership is demonstrating an inability to confront them both ideologically and practically.
Thus, as a result of the Islamization of Europe, the British ruling class, relying on the European infrastructure of the Muslim Brotherhood, gains a serious chance to establish control over Western Europe.
The Royal Family and the Fashion for Islam
By accelerating the process of Islamization, the British ruling class is increasingly openly demonstrating its closeness to the Islamic world. For example, in April 2018, The Daily Mail published an article claiming that Queen Elizabeth II is a direct descendant of the founder of Islam, the Prophet Muhammad. [7]
The Queen's son, the current King Charles III, is particularly committed to promoting Islam and is patron of the Centre for Islamic Studies in Oxford. In June 2025, at the centre's 40th anniversary ceremony, he said:
"Founded in 1985, the center has become a beacon of Islamic scholarship. The centre's ongoing commitment to objective scholarship and international cooperation, underpinned by principles of dialogue, deep understanding and mutual respect, is more imperative than ever in today's world." [8]
Charles's strange love for the Arab religion may be explained by the fact that, while Prince of Wales, he secretly converted to Islam. The Grand Mufti of Cyprus, Nazim Al-Haqqani, stated this in 1996: "Did you know that Prince Charles has converted to Islam. Yes, yes. He is a Muslim. I can't say more. But it happened in Turkey. Oh, yes, he converted all right." [9]
Rumors of the Prince of Wales's conversion to Islam remain controversial. However, the fact that officials have been forced to deny them is a result of the Prince's statements and actions.
Confirming such rumors, Charles took steps to accord Islam a special status. He created a group of twelve "wise men" to advise him on matters of Islamic religion and culture. The secret nature of its meetings has generated considerable speculation, especially since no similar groups exist for other faiths in the UK. [10]
The aristocracy follows the example of the royal family
The royal family's example has become something of a trend among the British aristocracy. Some of its members are voluntarily converting to Islam, adapting to societal changes. Russian historian Andrey Fursov noted in an interview:
"Some of the British elite have begun to convert to Islam, even though the religion is not of fundamental importance to them. This process appears to be an attempt to adapt to change."
Fursov recounted how one of the aristocrats with whom he spoke explained his adoption of Islam by saying that it was 'promising'. [11]
Methods of imposing radical Islam in Europe
The methods of the British ruling class to impose radical Islam were outlined by Evgeny Gilbo in his lecture on the problem of racial substitution in Europe:
"To achieve Islamization, the British elite has relied on a radical form of Islam. Using state funds, the government is undertaking a massive construction of mosques and paying salaries to radical imams who indoctrinate young people." [12]
"The construction of mosques in Europe is driven by government programs, not by migrant demand. Muslims are forced into mosques through administrative measures, as only 3% of them are truly religious.
Islamic terrorism in Europe is coordinated by European intelligence services, which control Muslim preachers and direct them towards radicalization.
Similar processes are occurring in Russia, where the influence of British agents within the intelligence services remains significant. In Germany, the intelligence services effectively operate under Anglo-American control. Britain plays a key role in supporting Islamic radicalism in Europe." [13]
Suppression of indigenous resistance
By condoning Islamization, the British elite not only floods the country with migrants but also encourages these newcomers to commit crimes against the native population. The town of Rochdale, where for many years gangs of migrants raped children under the protection of the police and prosecutors, has become a scandalous symbol of modern Britain. [14-17]
To suppress the resistance of the indigenous population, the Conservative government of Rishi Sunak passed the Internet Safety Act 2023, unofficially known as the Digital Gulag Act. [18,19] This law introduced total internet censorship, restricted freedom of speech and access to information, and abolished the right to privacy.
Not content with this, in July 2025, Keir Starmer's Labour government established a special police unit to monitor anti-immigration sentiment on social media. [20]
The Islamization of the "birthplace of modern democracy" has gone so far that Italian journalist Giulio Meotti, who visited Britain in 2025, wrote an article with the threatening headline: "England could become an Islamic state with nuclear weapons." [21]
CONCLUSION
In an effort to retain power, the British ruling class is prepared to sacrifice one of the greatest achievements of human history - European civilization - leaving it to be torn apart by barbarians whose ethnogenesis has frozen at the tribe stage. [22]
Evgeny Gilbo spoke about the scale of the impending catastrophe and the possibility of stopping it in his lecture:
"Europe is rapidly becoming overrun with ethnically alien elements. They form pockets of chaos that, gradually expanding, capture ever more territories. Over time, these migrants will establish their own cultural hegemony and displace the indigenous population-exterminating or assimilating them. (It's enough to recall Syria and Iraq, where the indigenous Christian population has been completely replaced by Arab Muslim immigrants.)
However, ethnic substitution in Europe is not a spontaneous process. It is entirely determined by state policies that, instead of promoting the assimilation of migrants, encourage their cultural and religious dominance. Consequently, this process is reversible-provided that multiculturalism is abandoned." [23]
Thus, the Islamization of Europe is not a fatal inevitability. This process can be halted and reversed if nationally oriented forces come to power in EU countries. The fact that global media label these forces as "far-right" reflects the British ruling class's fear of the potential collapse of its "Islamic project."
[23] Evgeny Gilbo, "The Elimination of the White Population of Israel and Europe by Migrants in the Foreseeable Future", time 58:12 (February 13, 2024) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5mDme_NoYzg&t=3492s